<-- Previous | Next --> |
![]() ©V&A Images/Victoria and Albert Museum, London |
Because there were no written clues the only means to define the style was to accept that all the sixteenth century tapestries found at Chastleton were woven at Barcheston - even though there was no direct evidence. |
|
The Four Seasons, detail |
The essential characteristics of the large tapestries found there were summarized as having
Floral ground - initials or lettering - small scale scenes - eg Judgement of Paris, the Maps Because English words appear also on five small pieces, each finished by a striped border, also seen in the Judith tapestry and on the valance, they too were called Sheldon.
|
|
©V&A Images/Victoria and Albert Museum, London T.1-1933
|
Several smaller tapestries contained a central scene framed by an arch.
One piece, the Flight into Egypt, carried initials T E I. Even though no one knew where it came from, it seemed possible to suppose that it too should once have belonged to the Jones family of Chastleton. This assumption added three further 'typical' characteristics, seen also in a depiction of the Prodigal Son A central scene beneath an arch decorated with a ribbon
herm figures in the vertical borders hunting scenes in the horizontal borders |
|
©V&A Images/Victoria and Albert Museum, London T.117-1934 |
To these traits were later added
masks, as in the Sacheverell arms The consequence of this definition of the style was that a number of tapestries previously called Sheldon were excluded from that categorization. |
|
Except for the hunts, all these motifs could be found also on continental tapestries. |
Next-->...... |
|
Page 17 |